
In a civil legal matter, discovery encompasses all research and investigations that lead up to a settlement (for about 95% of matters) or trial (for the remaining 5% of cases).1 The planning of discovery activities often involves allocating limited resources and witness availability, but effective legal teams also consider the litigation divide—what comes before and what comes after a suit is filed with the court. Because discovery is a process, early scoping can help teams identify key facts and determine whether the record supports a potential claim worth pursuing.
Pre-litigation discovery helps legal teams evaluate risk, preserve evidence, and prepare a strategy before a lawsuit is filed. It can also provide greater access to information before a defendant is made aware of a threat, allowing them to scramble to lock their gates or otherwise complicate later evidence review.
The discovery phase of a legal case is when potential witnesses are interviewed and deposed, legal research is conducted, electronic evidence is compiled, and legal teams untangle the who/what/when/why/how details they’ll use as building blocks for trial strategy.
The difference between formal and pre-litigation discovery is whether activities occur before or after the court filing:
Early discovery results provide a strategic advantage and help shape goal-setting, formal discovery planning, and negotiations. Pre-litigation discovery is useful in most legal matters, but particularly critical for some practice areas and scenarios.
Common triggers and case types include:
In any dispute, early clarity can prevent avoidable motion practice once the case is in court.
Additionally, pre-litigation discovery actions are crucial if there’s reason to believe that notice of filing will result in attempts to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, discourage testimony, or otherwise introduce obstacles to later discovery, especially if a defendant controls key systems and may try to conceal records.
Even though “formal discovery” doesn’t begin until a suit is filed, that doesn’t make the pre-suit phase entirely “informal.” Your team will still need to act in accordance with:
Much of pre-suit research may be done through eDiscovery, so be particularly aware of regulations under the bodies that govern your jurisdiction or legal matter (or best practice guidelines your firm follows), such as:
Treat this as an investigative phase, and document defensible steps from collection to review. Basic principles common to many of these include:
There are a lot of pros when you weigh how much to invest in pre-litigation discovery. More informed decision-making, more thorough case strategy development, and evidence curation and protection all put you in a position of strength from the first day of negotiation and can reduce adverse surprises in court.
Assessing risk and assigning a value to a legal matter is ideally done at the client intake stage. In reality, however, some level of discovery is typically needed to fully:
It’s not just what the evidence proves, but how it was collected and preserved. Early planning and research done in accordance with court rules can help protect evidence by:
Once a lawsuit is filed and defendants are notified, it’s logical to expect some tightening of information and communication—the opposition becomes aware of a threat that could negatively impact their reputation and business, as well as cost time and money.
Anyone who relies on that individual or business entity, at a financial, emotional, or other level, may experience pressures that affect their willingness to be available to your team or to be forthcoming with information. You may need to consider whether documents or data may be hidden, destroyed, or falsified.
If key individuals or entities are known to have committed prior bad acts or if there are major financial damages at stake, consider whether you can act pre-emptively in early discovery to protect and preserve evidence.
While you may be able to informally interview some potential witnesses multiple times, the only interview that can carry over into court is an official deposition, complete with a swearing in by a court official and a transcript filed with the court.
You can potentially spend months deposing witnesses, but in reality, you’ll be limited by:
This may result in limits on both the number and duration of depositions. Pre-litigation discovery can help whittle down the list with early interviews so you can effectively gather deposed testimony most influential to your case outcome during pre-trial planning
The cons for pre-litigation discovery mostly come down to imprudence around law firm efficiency. Determine the appropriate time and cost to devote (not too little, not too much), and ensure activities are on target, setting the stage for by-the-book expansion later.
There’s a limit to how much you want to know. Early discovery is the time to highlight efficiency and summarization expertise. You’re looking for the just-right-sized helping of data to achieve your goals and support case strategy.
Look out for:
Pre-litigation research isn’t a shot in the dark—your team still needs to understand and adhere to the objectives and scope that furthers the client’s current interests. (And organization is always integral to client interests.)
With that in mind, be wary of:
Discovery outcomes depend on resource availability and efficiency. You have a limited amount of time for pre-litigation research and analysis to avoid overinvesting or missing the right timing.
To make the most of pre-litigation discovery, leverage outsourced specialists and refine your technology implementation and workflow efficiencies. Incorporate:
Pre-litigation discovery is a balancing act. You don’t want to overinvest in courtroom-ready demonstratives, but you also don’t want to start from scratch.
To that end, focus on litigation support solutions that ensure:
Strategic discovery planning starts before a complaint is filed. With early research, interviews, and consultation, your team will have an in-depth understanding of the risks, potential damages, key evidence, critical witnesses, and strategic direction of each legal matter.
Since 1996, U.S. Legal Support has provided top-notch, all-inclusive litigation support services for all stages of settlement and trial.
Firms of all sizes and practice types look to us for records retrieval, organization, and analysis, AI-powered medical records summarization. We also provide court reporting, realtime transcription, process serving, interpreting, trial graphics, demonstratives, and trial presentation and technology services.
Contact us today to learn more about our comprehensive litigation support services.
Sources:
Content published on the U.S. Legal Support blog is reviewed by professionals in the legal and litigation support services field to help ensure accurate information. The information provided in this blog is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice for attorneys or clients.