
Key Takeaways
In 2025, the share of data breaches involving third parties rose to 30%, double the year prior.1 With cybercriminals increasingly targeting law firms, it’s not just critical to maintain internal security practices but also to evaluate those of any external partners who handle your clients’ data.
Process serving data security refers to the technical and administrative safeguards a provider uses to protect client information and legal documents throughout the service process — from encryption and access controls to audit logging and regulatory compliance.
Selecting the right process serving partner for your firm starts with the consideration of efficiency, geographic reach, and depth of experience with complex cases, but that’s not where it ends. Come prepared to scrutinize their process serving data security, including the standards, controls, and audit trails that keep your clients’ information and legal documents protected.
A process serving partner’s activities, demeanor, and adherence to security and data protection practices reflect on your firm. Working with servers that lack the infrastructure and expertise to implement compliance and cybersecurity best practices can expose your firm to costly process serving mistakes and negative outcomes. Consider:
Logging in to a cloud-based system from any device and seeing the exact status of a service order, along with time-stamped events and scheduled next steps, eliminates the hassle and wait times of updates via phone calls and emails. On the other hand, it opens up a different challenge: ensuring the security of process serving at every stage.
Data encryption can be employed at rest, while the document is stored in any location, and while data is actively moving between endpoints: over email, via file upload, or through a client portal. The gold standards for encryption are:
Rather than a single username and password, accessing your vendor’s system should require MFA. This can incorporate:
Instead of granting full file system access to anyone who needs any level of document or system access, role-based permissions first establish different levels and types of access, then assign users to those roles. This limits data access to only those who need it, when they need it, to help mitigate risk.
Cloud storage that qualifies as secure integrates current practices on end-to-end encryption, authentication, and permissions. Additionally, it may offer:
The vendor system should allow for granular audit trails and activity logs that provide transparency and create a tamper-proof “black box” of user and system actions.
Bring your questions and be ready to take notes as you vet vendor security. Ask:
Ask whether data is encrypted at rest (AES-256 bit is the current standard), where it’s physically or virtually housed, and who has access to the underlying storage systems.
Geographic redundancy protects against data loss from a single point of failure — such as a regional outage or disaster — so ask whether backups are stored in a separate location from primary servers.
How often are backups performed?
More frequent backups (daily or continuous, rather than weekly) reduce the amount of data that could be lost in an outage or breach.
A mature provider should have a documented incident response plan, including client notification timelines and steps to restore service continuity.
Look for recognized frameworks like SOC 2 Type 2, NIST CSF 2.0, GDPR, or CCPA compliance, verified by a third-party auditor rather than self-attested.
If you don’t have cybersecurity familiarity on your team, consider a more formal vetting approach, such as a Third Party Service Inherent Risk Rating (TPSIRR) — an internal scoring method for ranking vendor risk based on the sensitivity of data they access — or a Standardized Information Gathering (SIG) Questionnaire, an industry-standard vendor security assessment template that covers areas like data handling, access control, and incident response.3
One of the best ways to demonstrate adherence to cybersecurity and data privacy standards is to adopt and safeguard voluntary compliance frameworks alongside mandated regulations. Ask potential partners about their adherence to:
| Standard | Type | What It Covers |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | Voluntary audit standard (AICPA) | The premier operational control benchmark for mature cybersecurity practices; verified through independent audit |
| NIST CSF 2.0 | Voluntary framework (U.S. NIST) | Guidelines to help organizations evaluate and improve security risks, safeguards, and protocols |
| GDPR | Mandated law | Legally binding privacy law covering all European Union (EU) residents |
| CCPA | Mandated law | California Consumer Privacy Act, covering all California residents |
| Other state-specific privacy laws | Mandated (varies) | Industry best practices and jurisdiction-specific requirements beyond the above |
In addition to what a company claims about its adoption of security standards or frameworks, look for red flags that can signal breakdowns or contradictions. These include:
For nearly 30 years, U.S. Legal Support has provided comprehensive litigation support services (process service, court reporting, and record retrieval) to legal firms and teams of all sizes and practice areas, from process serving for small firms to full support for enterprise legal departments. We leverage technology with care and adhere to strict cybersecurity and data privacy standards. Through our secure Client Portal, we offer online record ordering, document delivery and management, and realtime tracking and status updates.
Want to learn more about our process service offerings or place an order? Contact our team today.
Sources:
Content published on the U.S. Legal Support blog is reviewed by professionals in the legal and litigation support services field to help ensure accurate information. The information provided in this blog is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice for attorneys or clients.